Iran announces its virus death toll passes 30,000

Iran announced Saturday that its death toll from the coronavirus has passed the milestone of 30,000, in what has been the Mideast region’s worst outbreak.

Health Ministry spokeswoman Sima Sadat Lari announced that the total death toll from the outbreak had reached at least 30,123.

She said that 4,721 virus patients are in critical condition.

Iran has been struggling with the coronavirus since announcing its first cases in February, with more than 526,000 confirmed cases to date.

In recent weeks, Iran has seen daily death tolls spike to their highest-ever levels, sparking increasing concern even as government officials continue to resist a total lockdown for fear of cratering the economy, which has been hard-hit by U.S. sanctions.

On Wednesday, Iranian officials announced a travel ban to and from five major cities, including the capital of Tehran and the holy city of Mashhad, that they said aimed to contain the virus’ spread.

The coronavirus has also spread to some of the highest levels of Iran’s government, which includes many older men. Among those recently infected is the head of the country’s atomic energy organization, while Iran’s vice president in charge of budget and planning tested positive on Sunday.

After downplaying the outbreak in its first weeks, Iranian officials have more recently begun to admit the scope of the epidemic within the country.

Deputy Health Minister Iraj Harirchi, who had tested positive for the virus in March after playing down its threat and refuting reports of mass deaths, told state TV on Wednesday that the country’s true death toll is about double the reported figures.

According to officials, there are also large numbers of patients in hospitals being treated as COVID-19 cases but who have not been tested, whose tests came out as false negatives or whose symptoms are not the same as those listed by the World Health Organization and who are therefore not counted in the official case numbers.

Like in many other countries, the spiraling outbreak in Iran reflects the government’s contradictory virus response. This week, as the daily recorded death toll hit the record for three times, authorities announced tighter restrictions for the hard-hit capital of Tehran.

Recently reopened universities and schools, as well as libraries, mosques, cinemas, museums and beauty salons, shut down. In the past week, the government mandated that all Tehran residents wear face masks outdoors and in public places, warning violators would be fined. Officials promised those who tested positive would be closely tracked.

Movement restrictions this spring somewhat checked the spread of the disease. Then the government swiftly reopened the country, desperate to boost its stricken economy. Since June, the case count has steadily increased—and spiked to new heights in recent weeks.

Long before the virus hit, Iran’s economy was ailing, pummeled by U.S. sanctions after the Trump administration’s unilateral withdrawal in 2018 from Tehran’s nuclear accord with world powers. As the death toll soared this week, the nation’s currency plunged to its lowest level ever, following the U.S. administration’s decision last week to blacklist Iranian banks that had so far escaped the bulk of re-imposed American sanctions.

As Iran approaches winter, the seasonal influenza could be an added and serious issue for the country, as it has had purchasing the flu vaccine amid new American sanctions on Iranian banks.

Iran’s Red Crescent Society said in a tweet on Tuesday that they were in charge of importing two million flu vaccine doses into the country, but that new U.S. sanctions prevented the import.

Meanwhile on Saturday, the United Arab Emirates has announced its highest single-day total of new cases of the coronavirus amid a spike in the Gulf nation that is home to Abu Dhabi and Dubai.

The country’s Health Ministry said tests found 1,538 new cases of the virus, pushing the overall number of cases to 114,387.

The ministry said another four people died from the virus, pushing the overall death toll to 459. Overall recoveries are at 106,354.

Recorded infections have soared again in recent weeks, as authorities have relaxed restrictions and resumed schools for in-person instruction. Dubai has reopened its airport for international travelers and embarked on an active campaign promoting itself as a tourism destination amid the pandemic.

Source: Read Full Article

It's a … ! Pregnant Lesley Anne Murphy and Alex Kavanagh Reveal Baby's Sex

Spilling the beans! Lesley Anne Murphy and her fiancé, Alex Kavanagh, announced the sex of their unborn baby with an adorable reveal.

See Model Elsa Hosk and More Pregnant Stars’ Creative Sex Reveals

The Bachelor alum, 33, shared the news in an Instagram video posted on Friday, October 16. In the clip, the DRONEGEAR founder came home to find Murphy surrounded by pink balloons and popping a pink bottle. The pair showed off balloons that read “Oh baby” and “Baby girl” while the Temptations’ song “My Girl” plays in the background.

“Excited to announce … We’re having a BABY GIRL!!!!” the season 17 contestant captioned the post. “This is how I surprised Alex that the future is female🎉🎉🎉 #itsagirl #babygirl #girldad #thefutureisfemale.”

Excited to announce… We’re having a BABY GIRL!!!!💝This is how I surprised Alex that the future is female🎉🎉🎉 #itsagirl #babygirl #girldad #thefutureisfemale

A post shared byLesley • The Road Les Traveled (@lesleyannemurphy) on

The couple announced in September that they are expecting their first child. Murphy shared an Instagram video of herself jumping down to dance with Kavanagh before he cradled and kissed her growing bump. The sweet clip was set to The Ronettes’ “Be My Baby.”

“Started from the kitchen now we’re here,” Murphy captioned the post. “Baby Kavanagh taking flight in 2021! Finally someone to occupy the middle seat 🙂 @drone.pilot and I couldn’t be more excited to grow our little family!!! #family #love #travel #adventure #coronababy #thelastdance #kitchendance #encore.”

Bachelorette’s Emily Maynard, More Celeb Pregnancy Announcements of 2020

The Arkansas native detailed how she discovered her pregnancy in a blog post on October 6. Murphy wrote that she found out she was expecting when she missed a period and took a pregnancy test.

“I walked into the living room and blurted out, ‘Ummmm … we’re pregnant!’” she wrote. “As I was brushing my teeth, I could hear him taking really deep breaths from our bedroom. As I walked back in, he immediately ran out and vomited in the toilet. Talk about a physiological response to pregnancy news! And I thought I was supposed to be the sick one! We laugh about it all the time. He’s very excited to become a dad regardless of the response.”

Celebrity Engagements of 2020

The twosome announced their engagement in February after one year of dating. However, their wedding plans have been delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

“Wedding planning turned into prenatal care,” Murphy wrote in her October 6 blog post. “Scheduled flights transformed into scheduled house tours. When life gives you 2020 lemons, make lemonade because it’s yummy, refreshing and well, nonalcoholic.”

For access to all our exclusive celebrity videos and interviews – Subscribe on YouTube!

Source: Read Full Article

It’s Tough to Change the Minds of ‘Vaccine-Hesitant’ Parents, Study Finds

WEDNESDAY, Oct. 14, 2020 — When parents have concerns about the safety of childhood vaccinations, it can be tough to change their minds, as a new study shows.

The study involved “vaccine-hesitant” parents — a group distinct from the staunch “anti-vaxxer” crowd. They have worries about one or more routine vaccines, and question whether the benefits for their child are worthwhile.

Even though those parents are not “adamantly” opposed to vaccinations, it can still be hard for pediatricians to allay their concerns, said Jason Glanz, lead researcher on the study.

So Glanz and his colleagues looked at whether giving parents more information — online material “tailored” to their specific concerns — might help.

It didn’t. Parents who received the information were no more likely to have their babies up to date on vaccinations than other parents were, the study found.

The news was not all bad. Overall, more than 90% of babies in the study were all caught up on vaccinations.

So it may have been difficult to improve upon those numbers, according to Glanz, who is based at Kaiser Permanente Colorado’s Institute for Health Research in Aurora.

But, he said, it’s also possible the customized information reinforced some parents’ worries.

“It might have done more harm than good,” Glanz said.

That’s because among vaccine-hesitant parents, those who were directed to general information that was not tailored, had the highest vaccination rates — at 88%.

The findings were published online Oct. 12 in Pediatrics.

Childhood vaccination rates in the United States are generally high. But studies show that about 10% of parents either delay or refuse vaccinations for their kids — generally over safety worries.

Routine childhood vaccines have a long history of safe use, Glanz said, but some parents have questions. They may have heard that certain ingredients in vaccines are not safe, or worry that their baby is being given “too many” immunizations in a short time.

And during a busy pediatrician visit, Glanz said, it can be hard to address all those questions.

So his team tested a web-based tactic to augment routine checkups. They randomly assigned 824 pregnant women and new parents to one of three groups: One received standard vaccine information from their pediatrician; another was directed to the study website for additional, but general, information on immunizations; and the third received tailored information from the website.

That tailoring was done with the help of a survey that asked parents about their vaccine beliefs and concerns.

In the end, however, the targeted messaging flopped. It made no difference among parents overall: Across the three groups, between 91% and 93% of babies were up to date on vaccinations at 15 months of age.

And among the 98 parents who were deemed vaccine-hesitant, the tactic seemed to backfire: Only 67% of those babies were up to date compared to 88% of those whose parents received general vaccine information. The rate was 75% in the standard-care group.

Dr. Edgar Marcuse, an emeritus professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, wrote an editorial published with the study.

Like Glanz, he speculated that the targeted content may have “fanned the flames of doubt,” rather than quelling them.

It’s also possible, Marcuse said, that these types of questions are better addressed face-to-face than by “one-way” communication.

The question of how to sway vaccine-hesitant parents is always important, Marcuse said. And it has an added layer now, he noted, as health experts may encounter a wary public if and when a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available.

That vaccine would be brand-new, with only short-term data to back it up. But for routine childhood vaccinations, Marcuse said, the evidence supporting their effectiveness and safety is “overwhelming.”

Both he and Glanz urged parents to take any vaccine concerns to their doctor, rather than relying on what they find online.

Social media can be an especially powerful source of misinformation, Glanz noted.

“Your pediatrician is the best source of vaccine information — much better than social media,” he said.

Source: Read Full Article

Mum thought daughter’s stomach ache was anxiety but finds it's due to cancer

A mum who thought her shy daughter’s stomach ache was caused by back-to-school anxiety during the holidays was horrified to discover the little girl had a cancerous tumour in her abdomen.

Siân Rodney began to fear eight-year-old Olivia might have appendicitis when her symptoms worsened over Christmas and they

But when the family, from Bedford, went to hospital, doctors discovered a watermelon-sized tumour in Olivia’s abdomen.

Tests revealed the mass was Burkitt lymphoma – a rare and fast-growing cancer of the lymphatic system.

Health and safety worker Sian, 39, said: ‘Nobody ever dreams they will have to deal with childhood cancer.

‘When it’s suddenly in front of you, you feel like a rabbit caught in headlights with no idea what to do.

‘But, through all of this, Olivia has shown us what a strong little superstar she is.’

Fortunately, following eight rounds of aggressive chemotherapy – all administered during lockdown – Olivia is now cancer-free.

Olivia started telling her mum that she was tired during their regular 20-minute walks into town at the end of the summer in 2019.

Then, in early October, she kept saying that her tummy hurt.

As Olivia was eating normally and did not show signs of a bug, such as vomiting, Siân began to wonder whether her daughter was just feeling anxious about going to school.

But by January 2020, Olivia’s symptoms had worsened, so Siân took her to see the GP, who referred her to Bedford Hospital.

A scan revealed a mass around her abdomen, which doctors initially believed to be an abscess that had formed around her appendix.

Next, she was given intravenous antibiotics in a bid to banish any infection and Olivia seemed to be responding well.

But, after five days, her temperature suddenly spiked overnight, and doctors raced her to theatre for emergency surgery.

Siân said: ‘They planned to remove her appendix, thinking it had burst.

‘As my husband Chris and I waited for her to come back from theatre, another mum said to us, “Don’t worry, my little one just had their appendix out and they were back within 90 minutes. It won’t be long”.

‘But 90 minutes came and went, then two hours, then two and a half. I began to really worry, and said to Chris, “This hasn’t been a straightforward appendix removal, has it?”

‘After three hours, a consultant appeared, ashen-faced. I took one look at him and just started crying, “Where’s my baby?”.’

Medics explained that the mass that was originally thought to be an abscess appeared to be something much more sinister.

As it contained blood vessels that were too close to major organs to be safely removed, they could only take a small sample, which they sent away to be biopsied, along with some of her lymph nodes.

Siân continued: ‘From the moment they said the word mass, my mind was whirring.

‘By then, I knew we were dealing with something very serious.’

The next day, they were referred to Addenbrooke’s Hospital, in Cambridge, where an oncologist officially diagnosed Olivia with Burkitt lymphoma.

Her parents were honest with Olivia about the diagnosis.

‘We didn’t want to hide anything from her,’ said Siân. ‘That was really important to us. We also tried to keep things as positive as we could.

‘Of course, she had her down days, where she’d say to me, “I just want to go to school and see my friends, mum”.’

Within days of the diagnosis, Siân and her family were put in touch with CLIC Sargent – a cancer charity supporting young people and their families – who assigned Olivia a social worker.

Siân added: ‘CLIC Sargent was incredible. They helped us with everything you could possibly imagine, both practically and emotionally.

‘They were always at the other end of the phone if we had a question. They even gave us a grant of £170 when she was first diagnosed.’

As Olivia continued with chemotherapy, which she coped with remarkably well, and Siân found strength and solace through talking to other families in the ward.

Watching other families ring the bell at the end of their cancer treatments was emotional for Siân and her family to witness.

By April, after five rounds of chemotherapy, Olivia had a progress scan, which revealed that much of the original tumour had gone.

Ordinarily, surgeons explained, the tumour would be removed using keyhole surgery, but with operations on hold due to the pandemic, they decided to opt for three more rounds of chemotherapy instead.

Siân thinks the pandemic and lockdown has been good in a way as it has kept Olivia, who has a weak immune system, from picking up germs from people.

Thankfully, tests at the end of June found Olivia to be cancer-free – and she has remained healthy ever since.

Now back at school, she is having regular meetings to monitor her progress, but doctors are confident that she has beaten the disease.

Siân, who is keen to offer hope to other parents having a similar experience and to promote the work of CLIC Sargent, said: ‘Staff from the charity have been absolutely invaluable to our family.

‘Now I want to make sure other parents know about CLIC Sargent, too.’

If you’d like to support the charity, you can donate through their website.

Do you have a story you want to share?

Email [email protected] to tell us more.

Source: Read Full Article

Resistance training: here’s why it’s so effective for weight loss

Weight lifting, also known as resistance training, has been practised for centuries as a way of building muscular strength. Research shows that resistance training, whether done via body weight, resistance bands or machines, dumbbells or free weights, not only helps us build strength, but also improves muscle size and can help counteract age-related muscle loss.

More recently it’s become popular among those looking to lose weight. While exercises such as running and cycling are indeed effective for reducing body fat, these activities can simultaneously decrease muscle size, leading to weaker muscles and greater perceived weight loss, as muscle is more dense than fat. But unlike endurance exercises, evidence shows resistance training not only has beneficial effects on reducing body fat, it also increases muscle size and strength.

The ‘after-burn effect’

When we exercise, our muscles need more energy than they do when resting. This energy comes from our muscles’ ability to break down fat and carbohydrate (stored within the muscle, liver and fat tissue) with the help of oxygen. So during exercise, we breathe faster and our heart works harder to pump more oxygen, fat, and carbohydrate to our exercising muscles.

What is less obvious, however, is that after we’ve finished exercising, oxygen uptake actually remains elevated in order to restore muscles to their resting state by breaking down stored fat and carbohydrates. This phenomenon is called excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) – though more commonly known as the “after-burn effect”. It describes how long oxygen uptake remains elevated after exercise in order to help the muscles recover.

The extent and duration of the after-burn effect is determined by the type, length, and intensity of exercise, as well as fitness level and diet. Longer-lasting exercise that uses multiple large muscles, performed to or near fatigue, results in higher and longer-lasting after-burn.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and high intensity resistance training are most effective at elevating both short and long-term after-burn. The reason HIIT-type exercises are thought to be more effective than steady-state endurance exercise is because of the increased fatigue associated with HIIT. This fatigue leads to more oxygen and energy required over a prolonged period to repair damaged muscle and replenish depleted energy stores. As such, resistance exercise is an effective way to lose excess fat due to the high calorie cost of the actual training session, and the “after-burn effect”.

Long-term fat loss

Resistance training can also be effective for long-term weight control, too. This is because muscle size plays a major role in determining resting metabolic rate (RMR), which is how many calories your body requires to function at rest. Resting metabolic rate accounts for 60-75% of total energy expenditure in non-exercising people, and fat is the body’s preferred energy source at rest.

Increasing muscle size through resistance training increases RMR, thereby increasing or sustaining fat loss over time. A review of 18 studies found that resistance training was effective at increasing resting metabolic rate, whereas aerobic exercise and combined aerobic and resistance exercise were not as effective. However, it’s also important to control calorie intake in order to lose fat and sustain fat loss.

Resistance training exercises should engage the largest muscle groups, use whole body exercises performed standing and should involve two or more joints. All of these make the body work harder, thereby increasing the amount of muscle and therefore RMR. An effective resistance training programme should combine intensity, volume (number of exercises and sets), and progression (increasing both as you get stronger). The intensity should be high enough that you feel challenged during your workout.

The most effective way of doing this is using the repetition maximum method. For the purpose of fat loss, this should be performing between six and ten repetitions of an exercise with a resistance that results in fatigue, so that you cannot comfortably do another full repetition after the last one. Three to four sets, two or three times a week for each muscle group is recommended.

The repetition maximum method also ensures progression, because the stronger you get, the more you will need to increase resistance or load to cause fatigue by the tenth repetition. Progression can be achieved by increasing the resistance or intensity so that fatigue occurs after performing fewer repetitions, say eight or six.

Source: Read Full Article

BBC Mom Getting Interrupted Is Cute, But It's Time to Get Angry

If you haven’t seen the videos yet, rest assured you will have had hundreds of opportunities by day’s end: On Wednesday, two different mothers on two different British news channels had their interviews interrupted by their adorable children. It’s cute, no doubt. It’s something most of us can relate to this year, if we’re lucky enough to be able to work from home. But I’m wondering why more of us aren’t also enraged by the fact that this is our “new normal” with basically no end in sight.

Let’s go to the cuteness, first. Clare Wenham, assistant professor of global health policy at the London School of Economics, was on BBC News to discuss how local governments in England can make better use of data on COVID-19 cases to control the spread with lockdowns. I had to watch the video three times to understand that’s what she was talking about, because her daughter Scarlett stole the show by testing out different locations around the room for her unicorn drawing.

Wenham was very impressive in her ability to block out her daughter’s activities, but presenter Christian Fraser couldn’t help but acknowledge what was going on.

“What is your daughter called?” he said, basically ignoring Wenham’s previous statement. After she answered, he said, “Scarlett, I think it looks better on the lower shelf.”

Following Scarlett’s explanation about her interior decorating mission, Fraser declares this, “the most informative interview I’ve done all day.”

The internet has agreed, sharing the clip and launching polls about which shelf the unicorn should go on. For the title of favorite interrupted parent, Wenham is quickly outranking Robert Kelly, the dad whose children interrupted his BBC interview in 2017.

Meanwhile, Sky News foreign affairs editor Deborah Haynes was attempting to discuss the U.K.’s offer to accept 2.9 million British national overseas citizens and their family members from Hong Kong, in reaction to China’s new restrictive laws in the former British territory. But her son interrupted her to ask if he could have “two biscuits.”

Both Haynes and Wenham have replied to their sudden internet fame with grace, updating us on the unicorn’s status (top shelf) and chocolate cookie consumption. And to be clear, I think it’s a good sign that most people accept that this has become a necessary state of life during lockdown. This comes days after Florida State University announced it would no longer allow parents to care for their children while working from home. Other moms have been reporting that their employers are losing patience with them for having to include their children on Zoom calls, or schedule work at odd hours, even though they complete every work duty that is required of them.

But I’m also done with thinking this is cute. This is an international crisis, people. I’m unfamiliar with what’s going on in the U.K., but I know that the U.S. government is completely failing to address this problem. Opening up the economy can’t happen without giving us all of these things at once: more testing, more contact tracing, and a lot of funding to give working parents safe childcare options and safe schools.

On Thursday, the American Federation of School Administrators released a preliminary guide to reopening schools. In it, the organization estimates that for additional staffing and cleaning supplies, the average school district (3,659 students, eight school buildings) would need $1.8 million in additional funding. For an urban district like New York City (1.12 million students and 1,722 schools), the estimate is in the hundreds of millions. The Council of Chief State School Officers told the Senate that an additional $158 billion to $244 billion will be needed for safe reopening.

Remember how New York was using a convention center, Central Park, and a freaking Navy hospital ship to provide more bed space space for COVID cases this spring? Why aren’t we seeing that kind of mobilization right now to give us more school space for our children to remain socially distant from each other in the fall? Why aren’t there enormous movements to hire millions of new teachers so that we can give our kids smaller class sizes? Instead, we are looking at a fall in which working parents will still be either giving their jobs up entirely, or continuing this exhausting juggling act — only maybe sometimes having the relief of our kids going to school one week out of every three (that’s the estimate here in Brooklyn, anyway).

“Let me say the quiet part loud: In the COVID-19 economy, you’re allowed only a kid or a job,” Deb Perelman, founder of the SmittenKitchen blog, wrote in a New York Times op-ed on Thursday. Even though we actually have both, it’s impossible to do both well unless you’re wealthy enough to have a nanny.

Or, well, it’s next to impossible, anyway. Hours before Wenham went viral, Time published an excellent piece she co-authored about how the U.K. and the U.S. were once the best-prepared countries to tackle a pandemic, before our political leaders got in the way of science. She has also been leading research on the gendered effects of the pandemic around the world.

I’m so mad that instead of gaining international fame for that work, she has become an example of it. If you are too, it’s time to call every government representative you can to demand better funding for our schools to face this pandemic safely.

And if that seems too much to handle while you’re working and caring for your kids — we get it — just wear your damn masks and make sure everyone around you is too.

You know what hasn’t stopped being cute? These kids face masks.






Source: Read Full Article

It’s not just Alzheimer’s disease: Research highlights form of dementia

The long-running study on aging and brain health at the University of Kentucky’s Sanders-Brown Center on Aging Alzheimer’s Disease Center has once again resulted in important new findings—highlighting a complex and under-recognized form of dementia. The work was recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA): Neurology.

“One of the things that we’ve learned in the last decade or so is that a lot of people that we think have dementia from Alzheimer’s disease, actually don’t. There are other brain diseases that cause the same kind of symptoms as Alzheimer’s, including some that we only recently figured out existed,” said Erin Abner an associate professor at the University of Kentucky’s Sanders-Brown Center on Aging (SBCoA) and College of Public Health, who helped lead the recent study.

Abner collaborated with several of her colleagues at SBCoA for the study, which used brain autopsy data from 375 older adults within the University of Kentucky Alzheimer Disease Center Brain Bank. This work builds on the work done last year by Dr. Pete Nelson and his team to discover another form of dementia caused by TDP-43 proteinopathy now known as LATE.

Abner refers to misfolded TDP-43 protein, which was discovered in 2006, as the “newest brain bad guy.” She says although TDP-43 exists normally in a non-disease causing form, it is seen in multiple debilitating diseases in addition to LATE, including ALS and frontotemporal dementia. She says as she and the team at SBCoA reviewed clinical and brain autopsy data for research participants, they noticed there were significantly more people than expected that had not only Alzheimer’s pathology but also pathology indicating Lewy bodies (alpha synuclein), and the ‘newest brain bad guy’—TDP-43.

“They had every neurodegeneration causing pathology that we know about. There was not a name for this, so we came up with one: quadruple misfolded proteins, or QMP,” stated Abner.

The group then obtained more data to conduct a study of how often QMP occurred and what that meant for the participant with QMP. The study found that about 20% of the participants with dementia had QMP, and their dementia was the most severe.

Source: Read Full Article

Nicholas Hoult Makes Rare Comments About Raising Son: 'It's Mad'

A sneak peek! Nicholas Hoult gave a rare glimpse into life with his young son on Monday, May 11.

“I’m loving it,” the actor, 30, said of fatherhood during a virtual appearance on the Late Late Show With James Corden. “It’s mad. It’s a learning curve, isn’t it? There’s a lot to take in. But overall, it’s like that time again, it brings back a lot of memories of your childhood.”

The Tolkien star explained, “It makes you play again — which I’m really enjoying, particularly with this time now with everything shut down and not having to work. I’m kind of just playing trains all day. It’s great.”

Now that the English star has a child, he “doesn’t understand” how he ever acted in a play when he was 3.

“How do you convince the kid to do what you want them to do, like designate a time on stage?” Hoult wondered. “Because I can’t convince [my son] to do anything.”

News broke in April 2018 that the Warm Bodies star and his girlfriend, Bryana Holly, had welcomed their first child together.

Nine months later, the new dad broke his silence on his baby boy, telling the Evening Standard: “The levels of tiredness are extreme. No one warns you about it! But the level of love that comes with it outweighs everything. It’s phenomenal. I’m loving it. And it evolves all the time. They change so much, every day is different. It fills you up as a human completely.”

Hoult talks quicker in interviews as a dad because he “need[s] to get home to them,” he joked in the January 2019 interview.

Prior to his relationship with Holly, 26, Hoult dated his X-Men: First Class costar Jennifer Lawrence on and off from 2011 to 2014.

The former couple’s “difficult schedules” caused their split, a source told Us Weekly exclusively after their breakup. “They just weren’t together a lot, her life is a whirlwind. They have gotten back together before, it just got to be too hard for now.” Lawrence, 29, for her part, married Cooke Maroney in October 2019.

For access to all our exclusive celebrity videos and interviews – Subscribe on YouTube!

Source: Read Full Article